WHAT’S HOT NOW

Theme images by kelvinjay. Powered by Blogger.

Social bar 300×250

" });

atOptions = { 'key' : '612f3b1264875bfbdbdf089400bd2210', 'form

atOptions = { 'key' : '612f3b1264875bfbdbdf089400bd2210', 'form

  • ()
" });

Banner 300×250

Social bar

" });

Banner 300×250

" });

Beware the Siren Song of 'Calm' Fiscal Waters

 Beware the Siren Song of 'Calm' Fiscal Waters


The United States is steaming ahead into uncharted fiscal waters, with rapidly growing federal debt promising a turbulent economic future. During their recent presidential administrations, candidates Joe Biden and Donald Trump have added trillions to the national debt, leaving America at a critical juncture that demands urgent, bipartisan action.

()

For those following this column, the numbers are stark: U.S. government debt is projected to reach a staggering 122% of gross domestic product by 2034, far surpassing levels seen even during World War II. This sharp rise from the current 99% is based on optimistic assumptions about interest rates, inflation, and economic growth.

()

The date to watch is 2038, when this debt-to-GDP ratio is poised to surpass the previous record set during the pandemic year of 2020. Unfortunately, the end of the pandemic hasn't quelled the surge in spending.

So far, the U.S. hasn't faced significant repercussions for its leaders' fiscal irresponsibility. This has led some economists to develop optimistic theories suggesting that debt doesn't matter and that deficit hawks like me are merely fearmongers.

()

However, the soothing assurances from deficit doves have quieted somewhat recently, as the U.S. experienced its largest inflation surge in 50 years and rising interest rates — which were supposedly a thing of the past — have continued to climb.

()

Unfortunately, recognizing the dangers of fiscal irresponsibility doesn't necessarily translate into political will to act responsibly. Therefore, it's crucial to emphasize once again that fiscal stability should be everyone's top priority.


History provides sobering lessons on the consequences of unchecked government debt. Noted historian Niall Ferguson recently wrote in Bloomberg that his studies show all great powers that spend more on debt service than on defense eventually lose their status. Whether it's the British Empire or France's ancien régime, excessive borrowing and spending lead to economic weakness, loss of global influence, and eventual downfall.

()

The U.S. is already crossing this ominous line. This year alone, interest payments on the national debt will reach $892 billion, surpassing defense base funding. By 2034, annual interest payments are projected to reach $1.71 trillion, widening the gap into an abyss.

I hope legislators won't think that fixing this issue merely requires increasing defense spending.


The real issue is the substantial share of the budget consumed by interest payments, making austerity the necessary solution.

()

High interest payments likely contribute to the Federal Reserve's challenges in reducing inflation to its target of 2%. The more the Treasury borrows from the Fed, the stronger the inflationary pressures.


Interest payments funded by debt slow economic activity further. As the Peterson Foundation aptly summarizes, a higher debt burden affects everyone: "If high levels of debt crowd out private investments in capital goods, workers would have less to use in their jobs, which would translate to lower productivity and, therefore, lower wages."

()

Yet the American political landscape remains eerily calm amid heavy fiscal weather. Politicians don't seem concerned that slower economic growth or a debt crisis could impede their priorities, whether tax cuts, climate initiatives, or poverty programs.


They should be worried.


Instead, both sides avoid addressing the root causes of the debt crisis, a perfect storm of rising interest payments and the looming insolvency of Social Security and Medicare. Substantive discussion and action are notably absent.

()

This is a solvable problem.


The U.S. has successfully navigated past debt challenges, notably in the 1990s, and the potential political rewards are enormous. However, the risk of being blamed for a crisis triggered by a credit rating downgrade or loss of confidence among international lenders looms large and can occur with surprising speed.


Additionally, the specter of major debt-holders like China dumping U.S. Treasuries adds another layer of geopolitical vulnerability.

()

As we stand at this crossroads, will America heed the warnings of history and take decisive action to address its debt crisis? The future of the nation's economic strength and global leadership hangs in the balance.


If we, as citizens, recognize the gravity of the situation and insist on action, policymakers will have little choice but to work toward a sustainable fiscal future. The alternative — following the path of fallen empires — is a fate that a great nation like America must avoid at all costs.

()

Veronique de Rugy is a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. Her primary research interests include the U.S. economy, federal budget, homeland security, taxation, tax competition, and financial privacy. She has been featured on "Stossel," "20/20," C-SPAN’s "Washington Journal," and Fox News. Ms. de Rugy has also been a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, a policy analyst at the Cato Institute, and a research fellow at the Atlas Economic Research Foundation. Read Veronique de Rugy's Reports

READ MORE 

Starmer pledges to ‘reset’ Britain as Labour takes over after 14 years of Conservative rule

 

Starmer pledges to ‘reset’ Britain as Labour takes over after 14 years of Conservative rule



The Labour Party has achieved a decisive victory in the UK general election, ending 14 years of Conservative rule and capitalizing on widespread public discontent.
Party leader Keir Starmer assumed the role of prime minister on Friday, following an invitation from King Charles III to form a new government. Starmer, promising to guide the country towards "calmer waters," begins his tenure at 61 with one of the largest parliamentary majorities in British history. 
1
1
In his inaugural address from outside 10 Downing Street, Starmer conveyed a clear message to the nation: Change starts now. He is expected to implement a series of far-reaching reforms.
"It is surely clear to everyone that our country needs a bigger reset, a rediscovery of who we are," he stated, warning that the national renewal he promised would take time. 
1
1
"Changing a country is not like flipping a switch; the world is now a more volatile place," he added.

Hurricane Beryl is not likely to hit Texas, as it dissipated in the Atlantic Ocean in 2018 and did not make landfall in the United States.

 Hurricane Beryl is not likely to hit Texas, as it dissipated in the Atlantic Ocean in 2018 and did not make landfall in the United States.


https://www.highrevenuenetwork.com/se1ihaz9?key=911c6876654cf3d34284db61ab9da018

Portions of South Texas are now within the forecast cone of Hurricane Beryl, which meteorologists say could arrive to the state over the weekend or early Monday.


Will Hurricane Beryl hit Texas? That's what many are wondering as the first hurricane of the 2024 season moves across the Caribbean Sea towards Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula. Parts of South Texas are now within the projected path of Hurricane Beryl, expected to potentially reach the state by the weekend or early Monday, according to meteorologists.
()
Forecasters remain uncertain about Beryl's future trajectory and intensity as it nears the Gulf Coast after impacting Mexico. The National Weather Service stated on Wednesday, "High uncertainty remains with both the track and intensity of Beryl."

High pressure plays a crucial role in determining Hurricane Beryl's path. After hitting Jamaica on Wednesday, Beryl is expected to continue its journey across the Caribbean on Thursday. Meteorologists explain that the storm is being guided around a significant high-pressure area over the U.S.


"If the high-pressure area remains strong, Beryl is likely to make landfall in Belize or Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula on Thursday night or Friday and then stay mostly over land," said AccuWeather meteorologist Bernie Rayno.

Hurricane Beryl Tracker: See the projected path of the Category 4 storm as it heads toward Jamaica.

The Project 2025" allegedly proposing to sell off all public land under the guise of addressing the housing crisis raises significant ethical and practical concerns. While housing shortages are a critical issue, selling off public lands may not be the most effective or sustainable solution. It could potentially lead to irreversible consequences such as loss of green spaces, increased urbanization, and reduced access to recreational areas for communities. Therefore, it's crucial to critically assess the motives and implications behind such proposals before considering their implementation.

The Project 2025" allegedly proposing to sell off all public land under the guise of addressing the housing crisis raises significant ethical and practical concerns. While housing shortages are a critical issue, selling off public lands may not be the most effective or sustainable solution. It could potentially lead to irreversible consequences such as loss of green spaces, increased urbanization, and reduced access to recreational areas for communities. Therefore, it's crucial to critically assess the motives and implications behind such proposals before considering their implementation.


It's evident from my previous coverage that I'm deeply committed to advocating for the preservation and accessibility of public lands. These lands are not just vast expanses; they're vital for outdoor activities like hiking, fishing, hunting, and recreational vehicle use, which millions of Americans enjoy annually.

()

However, there's a concerning trend where powerful interests—developers, certain conservation groups, and profit-driven mining and logging companies—are pushing to strip away these lands. They often starve government agencies of resources, paving the way for the sale of public lands to the highest bidder.

()

Recently, the 'Project 2025' Republican playbook has intensified this threat by proposing the mass sell-off of federal and state public lands under the guise of solving the housing crisis. On the surface, this proposal may sound appealing—who wouldn't support addressing a housing shortage affecting millions? Yet, this approach is deeply flawed and deceptive.

()

Let's be clear: selling off public lands won't solve the housing crisis; it will likely exacerbate it. It's a scheme designed to enrich those who are already exceedingly wealthy, at the expense of ordinary Americans and the environment we've worked hard to preserve for future generations.

()

William Perry Pendley, a key figure in Project 2025, has advocated for this agenda, claiming that unused federal lands could be repurposed for housing development. He and others argue that opening up these lands to developers would create new opportunities for home ownership. However, this narrative is misleading and, frankly, dishonest.

()

The reality is that these lands are not sitting idle; they serve critical ecological functions and provide recreational opportunities that enrich our lives. Selling them off would mean losing green spaces, increasing urban sprawl, and limiting public access to nature—a priceless resource.

()

In conclusion, while the housing crisis demands urgent and innovative solutions, sacrificing our public lands is not the answer. It's imperative to reject deceptive schemes like Project 2025 and instead focus on sustainable, equitable solutions that preserve our natural heritage for generations to come.

Bolivian general arrested after apparent failed coup attempt as government faces new crisis

 

Bolivian general arrested after apparent failed coup attempt as government faces new crisis



Led by a top general vowing to “restore democracy,” armored vehicles rammed the doors of Bolivia’s government palace Wednesday in what the president called a coup attempt, then quickly retreated — the latest crisis in the South American country facing a political battle and an economic crisis.(

)

Within hours, the nation of 12 million people saw a rapidly moving scenario in which the troops seemed to take control of the government of President Luis Arce. He vowed to stand firm and named a new army commander, who immediately ordered the troops to stand down.

Soon the soldiers pulled back, along with a line of military vehicles, ending the rebellion after just three hours. Hundreds of Arce’s supporters then rushed the square outside the palace, waving Bolivian flags, singing the national anthem and cheering.

The soldiers’ retreat was followed by the arrest of army chief Gen. Juan José Zúñiga, after the attorney general opened an investigation.

(

)

Government Minister Eduardo del Castillo said that in addition to Zúñiga, former navy Vice Adm. Juan Arnez Salvador was taken into custody.

“What was this group’s goal? The goal was to overturn the democratically elected authority,” del Castillo told journalists in announcing the arrests.

Late Wednesday, Defense Minister Edmundo Novillo said “everything is now under control.” Surrounded by the new military chiefs appointed by Arce, Novillo said that Bolivia lived a “failed coup.”(

)

The apparent coup attempt came as the country has faced months of tensions and political fights between Arce and his one-time ally, former leftist president Evo Morales, over control of the ruling party. It also came amid a severe economic crisis.

READ MORE 

Julian Assange ends stalemate with US, exchanging guilty plea for his freedom

 

Julian Assange ends stalemate with US, exchanging guilty plea for his freedom


WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange walked free for the first time in 12 years after a US judge signed off on his unexpected plea deal on Wednesday morning.


Assange walked out of the courtroom as a free man into the bright Saipan sunshine, raising one hand to a gaggle of the world’s press before departing by car for the airport where he caught a flight to the Australian capital Canberra.()

Speaking outside the court, Assange’s US lawyer Barry Pollack said he had “suffered tremendously in his fight for free speech and freedom of the press.”

“The prosecution of Julian Assange is unprecedented in the 100 years of the Espionage Act,” Pollack told reporters. “Mr. Assange revealed truthful, newsworthy information … We firmly believe that Mr. Assange never should have been charged under the Espionage Act and engaged in (an) exercise that journalists engage in every day.”()

In a stunning turn of events, the 52-year-old Australian was released from a high-security prison in London on Monday afternoon and had already boarded a private jet to leave the United Kingdom before the world even knew of his agreement with the US government.

He appeared in a US courtroom on the Northern Mariana Islands to formalize the agreement, officially pleading guilty to conspiring unlawfully to obtain and disseminate classified information over his alleged role in one of the largest breaches of classified material in US military history.

“I am, in fact, guilty of the charge,” Assange told the court in Saipan.(

)

The remote Pacific island chain is a US territory, located around 6,000 kilometers (3,700 miles) west of Hawaii.

Assange - who has long held a deep mistrust of the US, even going so far as accusing it of allegedly plotting his assassination - was hesitant about stepping foot in the continental US, and so prosecutors asked for all proceedings to take place in a day in a US federal court based in Saipan, the largest island and capital of the Northern Mariana Islands.

READ MORE 

Clapper: Assange has ‘sort of paid his dues’

 

Clapper: Assange has ‘sort of paid his dues’



Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper reacted to Julian Assange’s plea deal Monday, saying that the WikiLeaks founder has “sort of paid his dues” already.

Clapper — who served as director of national intelligence in 2010, when WikiLeaks published the trove of classified military and intelligence documents — said Monday that Assange’s plea deal “came out pretty well.”

“I think critical to this was his plea of one count of espionage. I think the law enforcement community and the Intelligence Community wouldn’t have bought into this without that,” he said on CNN’s “Laura Coates Live.”

“But he has served essentially seven years of incarceration in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. He was released from that and then the Brits arrested him. He did 62 months in jail. Hard time in London. So, he has sort of, you know, paid his dues,” he added.

Assange has spent the last five years in a British prison to avoid extradition to the U.S. to face the charges in connection to the documents. He agreed Monday to plead guilty to one felony charge under the Espionage Act, in a deal that would allow him credit for time served in the U.K., avoiding prison in the U.S.

Assange was indicted on 18 charges, including 17 espionage charges and one for computer misuse, following the release of the classified documents. 

Clapper said that while he thinks Assange has served his time, people should not think it is “okay” to reveal classified information.

“I think another issue here, speaking on behalf of the Intelligence Community, is you can’t have a system where people on their own unilaterally decide, well, I just think it’s okay to expose all this classified information when they’ve made a commitment to protect it. That, to me, is very important principle to bear in mind here,” he said.

READ MORE