WHAT’S HOT NOW

Theme images by kelvinjay. Powered by Blogger.

Social bar 300×250

" });

atOptions = { 'key' : '612f3b1264875bfbdbdf089400bd2210', 'form

atOptions = { 'key' : '612f3b1264875bfbdbdf089400bd2210', 'form

  • ()
" });

Banner 300×250

Social bar

" });

Banner 300×250

" });

Woman killed and 10 injured in shooting in southern Israel

Woman killed and 10 injured in shooting in southern Israel

Woman killed and 10 injured in shooting in southern Israel

( +)

A 25-year-old woman has died and 10 others have been injured in a shooting in the southern Israeli city of Beersheba, local authorities said.

The gunman was shot dead at the scene after what police described as a "suspected terror attack" at the city's central bus station.

Footage posted online, which the BBC has not been able to verify, showed dead or injured people inside a McDonald’s.

Israel's ambulance service said medics are treating ten victims, some of whom suffered gunshot wounds.


One woman is in a “moderate to serious” condition and four others are in a “moderate condition”, the ambulance service said.

They have been taken to the nearby Soroka Hospital.

( +)


Shortly after the attack, Israel’s transport minister Miri Regev called for the families of “terrorists” to be deported from the country.

“The time has come for a deterrent punishment to prevent the attacks on Israeli territory,” she wrote on X.

Last week, seven people were killed in a shooting and knife attack in Tel Aviv after a gunman opened fire at members of the public in the Jaffa area.

( +)

Israeli authorities have said they are on high alert across the country ahead of the one year anniversary of Hamas’s assault on southern Israel on 7 October last year, which triggered the current Gaza war.


READ MORE 

Tunisia's leader looks for new term with one competitor in prison


 Tunisia's leader looks for new term with one competitor in prison


Tunisians began voting on Sunday in an election in which President Kais Saied is seeking a second term, with his main rival suddenly jailed last month and the other candidate heading a minor political party.
Tunisia had for years been hailed as the only relative success story of the 2011 "Arab spring" uprisings for introducing a competitive, though flawed, democracy following decades of autocratic rule.
( +)
However, rights groups now say Saied, in power since 2019, has undone many of those democratic gains while removing institutional and legal checks on his power. Saied, 66, has rejected criticism of his actions, saying he is fighting a corrupt elite and traitors, and that he will not be a dictator.
Sunday's election pits Saied against two rivals: his former ally turned critic, Chaab Party leader Zouhair Maghzaoui, and Ayachi Zammel, who had been seen as posing a big threat to Saied until he was jailed last month.
Senior figures from the biggest parties, which largely oppose Saied, have been imprisoned on various charges over the past year and those parties have not publicly backed any of the three candidates on Sunday's ballot. Other opponents have been barred from running.
( +)
"The scene is shameful. Journalists and opponents in prison, including one presidential candidate. But I will vote for change," said Wael, a bank employee in Tunis, who gave only his first name.
Polls close at 6 p.m. (1700 GMT) and results are expected in the next two days.
Political tensions have risen since an electoral commission named by Saied disqualified three prominent candidates last month, amid protests by opposition and civil society groups.
( +)
Lawmakers loyal to Saied then approved a law last week stripping the administrative court of authority over election disputes. This Court is widely seen as the country's last independent judicial body, after Saied dissolved the Supreme Judicial Council and dismissed dozens of judges in 2022.
While elections in the years soon after the 2011 revolution were fiercely contested and drew very high participation rates, public anger at Tunisia's poor economic performance and corruption among the elite led to disillusionment.
( +)
Saied, elected in 2019, seized most powers in 2021 when he dissolved the elected parliament and rewrote the constitution, a move the opposition described as a coup.
A referendum on the constitution passed with turnout of only 30%, while a January 2023 runoff for the new, nearly powerless, parliament he created with that constitution had turnout of only 11%.

They are looking at about finishing the US Constitution. Which party is truly risky?


They are looking at about finishing the US Constitution.
Which party is truly risky?

In the summer of 1787, the air in Philadelphia was thick with anticipation. Delegates from thirteen fledgling states gathered to deliberate a bold new framework for governance: the United States Constitution. Among them were visionaries like George Washington, James Madison, and Benjamin Franklin, each driven by a common goal—to forge a unified nation from a patchwork of states.
( +)
As discussions unfolded within the grand hall of Independence Hall, the atmosphere fluctuated between heated debates and moments of quiet reflection. Delegates wrestled with pressing issues: the balance of power between state and federal authority, the rights of citizens, and the delicate balance between free and enslaved populations. Every decision carried monumental consequences, and tensions ran high.

In this charged environment, two factions began to emerge: the Federalists, who advocated for a strong central government, and the Anti-Federalists, who championed states’ rights and feared that a powerful federal government might become tyrannical. This ideological split laid the groundwork for future political parties and debates that would echo through American history.
( +)
The Federalists, led by figures like Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, argued passionately for a Constitution that would ensure stability and unity. They envisioned a nation capable of standing on the world stage, economically and militarily strong. Hamilton, in particular, saw the potential for an ambitious economic framework that would promote industry and trade. “Without a strong central government,” he proclaimed, “we risk becoming a collection of disunited states, vulnerable to foreign powers and internal strife.”
( +)
Opposing them, the Anti-Federalists raised valid concerns. Patrick Henry famously warned, “Give me liberty or give me death!” He feared that the proposed Constitution would encroach upon the liberties that had been fought for during the Revolution. “The government is the servant of the people, not their master. If we empower it too much, we risk becoming slaves to our own creation.”

As the debates wore on, it became increasingly clear that the stakes were high. The framers were not merely drafting a document; they were crafting a legacy that would determine the future of a nation. Every article and amendment was debated, dissected, and deliberated over the course of months. The delegates faced the monumental task of reconciling their competing interests while keeping the ultimate goal of a functional government in sight.
( +)
On a particularly hot July day, the conversation turned to the contentious issue of representation. Larger states argued for proportional representation based on population, while smaller states insisted on equal representation to prevent domination. A compromise was reached, resulting in a bicameral legislature that balanced both interests—the House of Representatives for population-based representation and the Senate for equal state representation.

Yet, even with compromises like this, the divide between Federalists and Anti-Federalists grew deeper. The question of how much power to grant the federal government lingered. At the heart of the debate was the fear of tyranny—the belief that too much power concentrated in one entity could lead to oppression. This fear resonated deeply, especially for those who had fought against British rule.
( +)
In September 1787, after months of arduous discussions, the delegates gathered to sign the final draft of the Constitution. The room was filled with a mix of hope and apprehension. Washington, who had been appointed to preside over the convention, rose to speak. His words carried the weight of a nation’s future: “We have written a Constitution that we hope will withstand the test of time. Yet, the true test will come when it is put into practice.”

The final draft was sent to the states for ratification. The Federalists launched an aggressive campaign to promote the Constitution, publishing a series of essays known as the Federalist Papers to defend their vision. Madison, Hamilton, and John Jay took to ink, articulating the necessity of a strong federal government and addressing the fears of the Anti-Federalists.
( +)
As the ratification debates unfolded in state after state, the country found itself divided. In some areas, Federalists found support, while in others, Anti-Federalist sentiments thrived. The debates became intensely personal, with communities often divided along ideological lines. The stakes were clear: without ratification, the United States risked disintegration.

In Virginia, the ratification convention became a battleground for these opposing views. The room buzzed with fervor as delegates voiced their opinions. In one corner stood the eloquent and impassioned Patrick Henry, warning against a powerful central authority. In the other stood Madison, arguing for the need to unify the states. The debates were fierce, with both sides aware that the outcome could alter the course of history.

Ultimately, the tide began to turn. As more states ratified the Constitution, the momentum shifted. The Federalists had successfully argued that a strong central government was essential for maintaining order and protecting liberties. Yet, to appease the Anti-Federalists, they promised to add a Bill of Rights—a guarantee of individual liberties that would safeguard against the very tyranny they feared.

The promise of a Bill of Rights was a pivotal moment. It reassured those who worried about potential overreach by the federal government, helping to bridge the divide. This concession led to the final ratifications, and on June 21, 1788, New Hampshire became the ninth state to ratify, effectively bringing the Constitution into effect.
( +)
As the nation moved forward under its new framework, the political landscape began to solidify. The Federalists and Anti-Federalists evolved into distinct political parties, each with its ideologies, followers, and visions for the future. The Federalists championed a strong central government and a robust economy, while the Anti-Federalists transformed into the Democratic-Republican Party, advocating for states’ rights and agrarian interests.


The new government faced numerous challenges, from foreign affairs to internal conflicts. The political arena was a cauldron of debate and disagreement. Both parties viewed each other as risky, albeit in different ways. Federalists believed the Anti-Federalists’ insistence on states’ rights jeopardized national unity and security. Conversely, the Anti-Federalists saw the Federalists’ push for centralization as a potential path to despotism.
( +)

As years turned into decades, the Constitution proved to be both a living document and a battleground for ideological clashes. The Bill of Rights was ratified in 1791, laying a foundation for civil liberties that would guide the nation through turbulent times.


By the dawn of the 19th century, the young nation was at a crossroads, facing the realities of governance, territorial expansion, and deepening divisions. The tension between the two parties grew, fueled by differing visions for America’s future. The narrative of risk—of freedom versus security, of individual rights versus collective governance—continued to shape the nation’s identity.
( +)
The debates sparked by the ratification of the Constitution were merely the beginning. The subsequent years would see the emergence of new issues—slavery, economic disparity, and civil rights—that would further test the resilience of the framework the framers had created.

Ultimately, the journey to complete the Constitution was not just about drafting a document; it was about navigating the complexities of human governance, balancing competing interests, and laying the groundwork for a nation that would wrestle with the very ideals of liberty and justice for generations to come. The legacy of the Constitution would be a testament to the enduring struggle for unity in diversity, and the ever-present question of which party—and which vision—was truly risky would echo throughout American history.


READ MORE 

John Amos recollected by Al Roker, 'West Wing' co-stars: 'This one hits unique'


John Amos recollected by Al Roker, 'West Wing' co-stars: 'This one hits unique'


Full video 

 Al Roker reflected on John Amos's passing, emphasizing the profound impact he had on those who knew him, particularly his 'West Wing' co-stars. Roker described Amos as a magnetic presence, both on and off screen, whose talent and warmth created a lasting bond among the cast. "This one hits unique," Roker said, highlighting how Amos's mentorship and genuine spirit enriched their lives and careers. The shared memories of laughter, wisdom, and camaraderie serve as a testament to Amos’s extraordinary legacy, leaving an indelible mark on all who had the privilege to work alongside him.

( +)

Al Roker expressed deep sorrow over the passing of John Amos, remarking that this loss resonates uniquely within the 'West Wing' family. He recalled how Amos, with his remarkable talent and charismatic presence, brought a sense of authenticity to every scene, elevating the work of everyone around him. Roker described Amos as a mentor who not only shared his wisdom but also fostered a spirit of camaraderie among the cast. "This one hits unique," he said, reflecting on the profound connections formed through shared experiences and the laughter they enjoyed together. The impact Amos had on their lives extended far beyond the screen, leaving a legacy of kindness and inspiration that will forever be cherished by his co-stars.

( +)

READ MORE